ElZayat v. Ontario (Ombudsman)
The motion judge did not err in proceeding in the appellant's absence given notice and discretionary considerations; there was no evidence of bad faith and no genuine issue for trial, therefore summary judgment dismissing the action was properly granted and is entitled to deference on appeal.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2021 ONCA 336
- Parties
- Plaintiff (appellant): Haytham ElZayat; Defendant (respondent): Ontario Ombudsman
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal From Summary Judgment Dismissal (superior Court)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Immunity of Public Body, Bad Faith, Costs, Adjournment/discretion
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Haytham ElZayat
Plaintiff (appellant)
Ontario Ombudsman
Defendant (respondent)
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal From Summary Judgment Dismissal (superior Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the motion judge erred in granting summary judgment dismissing the action
- 2 Whether the motion should have been heard in the appellant's absence
- 3 Whether the respondent is immune from proceedings absent bad faith
Ratio Decidendi
The motion judge did not err in proceeding in the appellant's absence given notice and discretionary considerations; there was no evidence of bad faith and no genuine issue for trial, therefore summary judgment dismissing the action was properly granted and is entitled to deference on appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
- Respondent awarded costs fixed at $4,500 inclusive.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment