Body Shop Canada Ltd. v. Dawn Carson Enterprises Ltd.
The court struck Carson's defamation claim against OPB (and against BSC by consent) for failure to plead necessary particulars (identities, exact words, particulars of publication) and struck the abuse of process claim against OPB because the pleadings do not allege use of legal process for a collateral illicit purpose or the requisite acts or special damages; however the court refused to strike the tortious interference claims because the elements of economic torts remain unsettled and Carson's pleadings disclose a plausible legal basis that must be decided at trial.
- Citation
- 2010 NSSC 25
- Parties
- Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim: The Body Shop Canada Limited; Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim: Dawn Carson Enterprises Limited; Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim: Dawn Carson; Third Party: OPB Realty (Halifax Centre) Inc.; Third Party: 20 VIC Management Inc.
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 21 January 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (contract and Tort) / Motions for Summary Judgment on Pleadings Under Rule 13.03
- Outcome
- Motions granted in part and denied in part: defamation claims struck against OPB and BSC (BSC by consent); abuse of process claim struck against OPB; motions to strike tortious interference claims denied.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Striking Pleadings, Tortious Interference With Contractual Relations, Abuse of Process, Particularity in Defamation Pleadings, Third Party Claims
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Body Shop Canada Limited
Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim
Dawn Carson Enterprises Limited
Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim
Dawn Carson
Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim
OPB Realty (Halifax Centre) Inc.
Third Party
20 VIC Management Inc.
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Civil (contract and Tort) / Motions for Summary Judgment on Pleadings Under Rule 13.03
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Carson's defamation pleadings against OPB and BSC disclose a cause of action
- 2 Whether Carson's pleadings disclose a cause of action for tortious interference with contractual relations against BSC and OPB
- 3 Whether Carson's pleadings disclose a cause of action for abuse of process against OPB
Ratio Decidendi
The court struck Carson's defamation claim against OPB (and against BSC by consent) for failure to plead necessary particulars (identities, exact words, particulars of publication) and struck the abuse of process claim against OPB because the pleadings do not allege use of legal process for a collateral illicit purpose or the requisite acts or special damages; however the court refused to strike the tortious interference claims because the elements of economic torts remain unsettled and Carson's pleadings disclose a plausible legal basis that must be decided at trial.
Court Disposition
Motions granted in part and denied in part: defamation claims struck against OPB and BSC (BSC by consent); abuse of process claim struck against OPB; motions to strike tortious interference claims denied.
Orders
- Defamation claim against OPB struck.
- Defamation claim against The Body Shop Canada Limited struck with the consent of Carson.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment