In re Rundle
The Supreme Court held that Ontario Surrogate Courts fall within the term 'Court of Probate' in s.37(d) of the Supreme Court Act and that the Surrogate judge's order on passing of accounts constituted a judicial 'case or proceeding' within that section; accordingly an appeal to this Court lies and, on the merits, the Appellate Division's variation of the Surrogate Court order was affirmed and the appeal dismissed.
- Citation
- (1915) 52 SCR 114
- Parties
- Appellant (plaintiff): The Trusts and Guarantee Company; Respondents (defendants): Clarence Arthur Rundle and Others
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 2 November 1915
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal; Probate (passing of Accounts) / On Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Ontario; Origin in Surrogate Court of the County of York
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Ontario affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Surrogate Court as Court of Probate Under S.37(d), Appealability of Orders on Passing of Accounts, Interpretation of Supreme Court Act S.37(d), Scope of Judicial Proceedings in Probate
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Trusts and Guarantee Company
Appellant (plaintiff)
Clarence Arthur Rundle and Others
Respondents (defendants)
Procedural Posture
Appeal; Probate (passing of Accounts) / On Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Ontario; Origin in Surrogate Court of the County of York
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an Ontario Surrogate Court is a "Court of Probate" within s.37(d) of the Supreme Court Act
- 2 Whether an order on passing of accounts by a Surrogate judge constitutes a "case or proceeding" or "judicial proceeding" under s.37(d) and is appealable to the Supreme Court of Canada
- 3 Whether the Appellate Division's variation of the Surrogate Court order was correct on the merits
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court held that Ontario Surrogate Courts fall within the term 'Court of Probate' in s.37(d) of the Supreme Court Act and that the Surrogate judge's order on passing of accounts constituted a judicial 'case or proceeding' within that section; accordingly an appeal to this Court lies and, on the merits, the Appellate Division's variation of the Surrogate Court order was affirmed and the appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Ontario affirmed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Costs awarded to respondents (appeal dismissed with costs)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment