Rogers Communications Canada Inc. v. Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada
Issue estoppel applies and the Plaintiffs are precluded from relitigating the Ringtone Download Issue; the 2010 Agreement and certified Tariff 24 provided juristic reasons for SOCAN's enrichment and SOCAN changed position by distributing royalties, so unjust enrichment and tracing remedies fail; Plaintiffs' action dismissed and SOCAN's counterclaim granted in part for outstanding Tariff 24 royalties through Dec 31, 2013 with interest.
- Citation
- 2021 FC 207
- Parties
- Plaintiff / Defendant by Counterclaim: Rogers Communications Canada Inc.; Plaintiff / Defendant by Counterclaim: Bell Mobility Inc.; Plaintiff / Defendant by Counterclaim: Québecor Media Inc.; Defendant / Plaintiff by Counterclaim: Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada (SOCAN)
- Court
- Federal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 5 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action Concerning Copyright Royalties and Restitution Under the Copyright Act / Trial Judgment (federal Court)
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' action dismissed; Defendant's counterclaim granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Tariff Certification, Ringtones and Downloads, Issue Estoppel / Res Judicata, Unjust Enrichment, Constructive Trust and Tracing, Change of Law Effect
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rogers Communications Canada Inc.
Plaintiff / Defendant by Counterclaim
Bell Mobility Inc.
Plaintiff / Defendant by Counterclaim
Québecor Media Inc.
Plaintiff / Defendant by Counterclaim
Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada (SOCAN)
Defendant / Plaintiff by Counterclaim
Procedural Posture
Civil Action Concerning Copyright Royalties and Restitution Under the Copyright Act / Trial Judgment (federal Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether issue estoppel (res judicata) applies to bar the Plaintiffs' claims regarding Tariff 24
- 2 Effect of the 2010 Agreement on Plaintiffs' right to seek restitution of Tariff 24 payments
- 3 Whether SOCAN was unjustly enriched by receiving Tariff 24 royalties
Ratio Decidendi
Issue estoppel applies and the Plaintiffs are precluded from relitigating the Ringtone Download Issue; the 2010 Agreement and certified Tariff 24 provided juristic reasons for SOCAN's enrichment and SOCAN changed position by distributing royalties, so unjust enrichment and tracing remedies fail; Plaintiffs' action dismissed and SOCAN's counterclaim granted in part for outstanding Tariff 24 royalties through Dec 31, 2013 with interest.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' action dismissed; Defendant's counterclaim granted in part
Orders
- The Plaintiffs' action is dismissed.
- The Defendant's (SOCAN) counterclaim is granted in part.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment