R. v. Adams
Given the scale, duration and sophistication of the fencing operation, the high value of recovered property, re‑offending on bail and limited insight by the offender, a custodial disposition was required; a total punitive quantum of 42 months imprisonment with specified consecutive and concurrent counts, fines totalling $82,000 and 12 months probation with 150 hours community service was just and appropriate, with 35 months pre‑trial custody credited resulting in a further 7 months to serve.
- Citation
- 2009 NSPC 44
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused/defendant: Peter Frederick Adams
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing (oral)
- Outcome
- Accused found guilty on admitted counts and sentenced to an aggregate 42 months imprisonment with 35 months credit for pre‑trial custody (net further 7 months to serve); fines totalling $82,000; probation 12 months with 150 hours community service; time in default for unpaid fines.
- Legal Topics
- Theft, Possession of Stolen Property, Break and Enter, Counselling Perjury, Fencing, Pre‑trial Custody Credit, Fines and Probation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
Peter Frederick Adams
Accused/defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing (oral)
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for large‑scale fencing operation and multiple theft offences
- 2 Whether a conditional sentence is appropriate
- 3 Application of totality and consecutive versus concurrent sentences
Ratio Decidendi
Given the scale, duration and sophistication of the fencing operation, the high value of recovered property, re‑offending on bail and limited insight by the offender, a custodial disposition was required; a total punitive quantum of 42 months imprisonment with specified consecutive and concurrent counts, fines totalling $82,000 and 12 months probation with 150 hours community service was just and appropriate, with 35 months pre‑trial custody credited resulting in a further 7 months to serve.
Court Disposition
Accused found guilty on admitted counts and sentenced to an aggregate 42 months imprisonment with 35 months credit for pre‑trial custody (net further 7 months to serve); fines totalling $82,000; probation 12 months with 150 hours community service; time in default for unpaid fines.
Orders
- Counselling perjury: 6 months custody, to run consecutive to any other disposition
- Break and enter and theft, Metro Self Storage (count 289): 12 months custody, consecutive to other dispositions; fine $20,000 pursuant to s.734
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment