R. v. MacKenzie
Custody (120 days concurrent on each count) was necessary because the offence directly attacked the democratic right to vote, the offender had a history of identical offences and an expressed intent to reoffend, and lesser sanctions had failed to deter him; custody plus a three-year probation with restrictive conditions best satisfied denunciation and deterrence and protected the public.
- Citation
- 2012 NSPC 19
- Parties
- Prosecution: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: Alexander James MacKenzie
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Accused sentenced to custody and probation
- Legal Topics
- Theft, Mischief, Sentencing Principles, Deterrence, Probation, Custodial Sentence, Offences Under Elections Act
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Prosecution
Alexander James MacKenzie
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for theft and mischief involving removal and damage of a ballot box
- 2 Application of sentencing principles in ss. 718, 718.1 and 718.2 of the Criminal Code
- 3 Aggravating effect of repeat offending and expressed intent to reoffend
Ratio Decidendi
Custody (120 days concurrent on each count) was necessary because the offence directly attacked the democratic right to vote, the offender had a history of identical offences and an expressed intent to reoffend, and lesser sanctions had failed to deter him; custody plus a three-year probation with restrictive conditions best satisfied denunciation and deterrence and protected the public.
Court Disposition
Accused sentenced to custody and probation
Orders
- Custody: 120 days on each charge, to be served concurrently and consecutive to any other sentence
- Probation: three years following custody
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment