Diversitel Communications Inc. v. Glacier Bay Inc.

Diversitel Communications Inc. v. Glacier Bay Inc.

The appeal is dismissed because the appellants failed to demonstrate a palpable and overriding error in the motions judge's finding that time was of the essence, and the proffered fresh evidence was irrelevant and did not meet the fresh evidence test; therefore the finding of fundamental breach and the motions judge's order stand.

Citation
C40887
Parties
Plaintiff/respondent: Diversitel Communications Inc.; Defendant/appellant: Glacier Bay Inc.
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
26 April 2004
Procedural Posture
Collection / Appeal From Order of the Superior Court of Justice (motion Judge’s Order Dated October 6, 2003); Heard and Decided by Court of Appeal on April 21, 2004
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Time Is of the Essence, Fundamental Breach, Fresh Evidence, Standard of Review — Palpable and Overriding Error
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Diversitel Communications Inc.

Plaintiff/respondent

Glacier Bay Inc.

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Collection / Appeal From Order of the Superior Court of Justice (motion Judge’s Order Dated October 6, 2003); Heard and Decided by Court of Appeal on April 21, 2004

  1. 1 Whether the motions judge erred in finding time was of the essence of the contract
  2. 2 Whether the appellants established a palpable and overriding error warranting appellate intervention
  3. 3 Whether the proffered fresh evidence met the legal test for admission and could displace the motions judge's finding

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal is dismissed because the appellants failed to demonstrate a palpable and overriding error in the motions judge's finding that time was of the essence, and the proffered fresh evidence was irrelevant and did not meet the fresh evidence test; therefore the finding of fundamental breach and the motions judge's order stand.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs.