R. v. Masters
Balancing the significant mitigating factors (youth, first offender status, addiction, guilty plea, engagement in treatment) against the gravity of possessing Schedule 1 drugs for trafficking and the need for denunciation and general deterrence, a custodial sentence is required but may be reduced from the typical federal range; the appropriate sentence is 90 days imprisonment followed by three years probation, with ancillary orders granted.
- Citation
- 2017 NSPC 75
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: David James Masters
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Controlled Drugs and Substances Act S.5(2) Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking / Sentencing Hearing Following Guilty Plea
- Outcome
- Guilty plea accepted; sentence imposed: 90 days imprisonment and three years probation.
- Legal Topics
- Trafficking, Possession for Purpose of Trafficking, First Offender Principle, Denunciation and Deterrence, Conditional Sentence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
David James Masters
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Controlled Drugs and Substances Act S.5(2) Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking / Sentencing Hearing Following Guilty Plea
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for possession for the purpose of trafficking under s.5(2) CDSA
- 2 Whether a non-custodial or conditional sentence is justified in light of mitigating factors
- 3 Whether the circumstances are exceptional to depart from the usual range of incarceration for Schedule 1 trafficking
Ratio Decidendi
Balancing the significant mitigating factors (youth, first offender status, addiction, guilty plea, engagement in treatment) against the gravity of possessing Schedule 1 drugs for trafficking and the need for denunciation and general deterrence, a custodial sentence is required but may be reduced from the typical federal range; the appropriate sentence is 90 days imprisonment followed by three years probation, with ancillary orders granted.
Court Disposition
Guilty plea accepted; sentence imposed: 90 days imprisonment and three years probation.
Orders
- 90 days imprisonment
- Three-year probation order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment