Johnson v. Johnson
Because this was a lengthy, fact‑specific family law trial with multiple witnesses and the appellant’s grounds implicate findings of fact and credibility, transcripts of all oral evidence and oral rulings are necessary. The appellant was granted a short, conditional period to demonstrate that transcription will proceed (including partial payment); failure to comply will permit the respondent to move to dismiss the appeal for delay; if compliance occurs, normal perfection timelines will apply.
- Citation
- 2026 ONCA 189
- Parties
- Applicant (respondent): Erin Kathryn Johnson; Respondent (appellant): Bradley William Johnson
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (family Law) / Case Management (transcript Production/perfection)
- Outcome
- Transcripts required; appellant given conditional deadline to order and partially pay for transcripts or respondent may move to dismiss appeal for delay.
- Legal Topics
- Transcripts, Perfection of Appeal, Dismissal for Delay, Security for Costs, Parenting Orders, Child Support, Best Interests of the Child
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Erin Kathryn Johnson
Applicant (respondent)
Bradley William Johnson
Respondent (appellant)
Procedural Posture
Appeal (family Law) / Case Management (transcript Production/perfection)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appellant may perfect the appeal without filing transcripts
- 2 Whether transcripts are necessary given the nature of the grounds of appeal (findings of fact and credibility)
- 3 Whether appeal should be dismissed for delay under r.61.13(1)(a)
Ratio Decidendi
Because this was a lengthy, fact‑specific family law trial with multiple witnesses and the appellant’s grounds implicate findings of fact and credibility, transcripts of all oral evidence and oral rulings are necessary. The appellant was granted a short, conditional period to demonstrate that transcription will proceed (including partial payment); failure to comply will permit the respondent to move to dismiss the appeal for delay; if compliance occurs, normal perfection timelines will apply.
Court Disposition
Transcripts required; appellant given conditional deadline to order and partially pay for transcripts or respondent may move to dismiss appeal for delay.
Orders
- Appellant shall, by March 20, 2026, file proof with the Registrar that he has directed the transcriptionist to proceed with preparation of transcripts of all oral evidence and oral rulings for the appeal
- Appellant shall, by March 20, 2026, file proof that the transcriptionist has agreed to proceed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment