Society Brand Clothes Ltd. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America
Because the defendants were unincorporated associations lacking civil personality and New York law did not recognize them as juridical persons for the purposes relied upon, they could not be sued in their common name under article 79 C.C.P.; incapacity apparent on the face of the record may be raised at any stage,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1931] SCR 321
- Parties
- Appellant / Plaintiff: Society Brand Clothes Ltd.; Respondent / Unincorporated Association: Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America; Respondent / Unincorporated Subsidiary Association: Montreal Joint Board; Respondent / Unincorporated Subsidiary Branch: Local Union No. 115 (Montreal); Respondent / Unincorporated Subsidiary Branch: Local Union No. 167 (Montreal); Respondent / Unincorporated Subsidiary Branch: Local Union No. 209 (Montreal); Respondent / Unincorporated Subsidiary Branch: Local Union No. 247 (Montreal); Respondent / Unincorporated Subsidiary Branch: Local Union No. 277 (Montreal)
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 23 December 1930
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (labour Law — Torts and Injunction) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Court of King's Bench, Quebec; Final Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment below affirmed to the extent it dismissed action against unincorporated associations
- Legal Topics
- Unincorporated Associations, Suability, Foreign Law Characterisation, Representative Actions, Registration of Trade Unions, Interlocutory Injunctions
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Society Brand Clothes Ltd.
Appellant / Plaintiff
Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America
Respondent / Unincorporated Association
Montreal Joint Board
Respondent / Unincorporated Subsidiary Association
Local Union No. 115 (Montreal)
Respondent / Unincorporated Subsidiary Branch
Local Union No. 167 (Montreal)
Respondent / Unincorporated Subsidiary Branch
Local Union No. 209 (Montreal)
Respondent / Unincorporated Subsidiary Branch
Local Union No. 247 (Montreal)
Respondent / Unincorporated Subsidiary Branch
Local Union No. 277 (Montreal)
Respondent / Unincorporated Subsidiary Branch
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (labour Law — Torts and Injunction) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Court of King's Bench, Quebec; Final Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an unincorporated labour union constitutes a juridical person suable in its common name
- 2 Whether Article 79 C.C.P. permits appearance of a foreign unincorporated association by virtue of foreign law
- 3 Whether incapacity apparent on the face of the process can be raised at any stage despite appearance (Article 176 C.C.P.)
Ratio Decidendi
Because the defendants were unincorporated associations lacking civil personality and New York law did not recognize them as juridical persons for the purposes relied upon, they could not be sued in their common name under article 79 C.C.P.; incapacity apparent on the face of the record may be raised at any stage, therefore the appeal was dismissed and the unincorporated bodies could not be held liable as entities distinct from their members.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment below affirmed to the extent it dismissed action against unincorporated associations
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judgment of the Court of King’s Bench and Superior Court dismissing the action against the unincorporated associations affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment