Suian v. Suian
The payor's income reduction was a material change in circumstances, but the payee failed to meet the high s.10 threshold of 'undue hardship' to justify maintaining an order above the Guideline amount; accordingly maintenance is reduced prospectively to the Guideline amount of $374 per month and not made retroactive.
- Citation
- 2002 BCSC 902
- Parties
- Plaintiff / Payee: Cindy Marie Louise Suian; Defendant / Applicant / Payor: David Miles Suian
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Child Support Variation / Hearing on Application to Vary Child Maintenance
- Outcome
- Application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Variation of Child Support, Undue Hardship Under S.10 of the Federal Child Support Guidelines, Material Change of Circumstances, Tax Deductibility Impact
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cindy Marie Louise Suian
Plaintiff / Payee
David Miles Suian
Defendant / Applicant / Payor
Procedural Posture
Family Law Child Support Variation / Hearing on Application to Vary Child Maintenance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the payor's reduction in income constitutes a material change of circumstances
- 2 Whether s.10 of the Federal Child Support Guidelines authorizes departure from the Guideline amount because reduction would cause undue hardship
- 3 Whether any variation should be retroactive
Ratio Decidendi
The payor's income reduction was a material change in circumstances, but the payee failed to meet the high s.10 threshold of 'undue hardship' to justify maintaining an order above the Guideline amount; accordingly maintenance is reduced prospectively to the Guideline amount of $374 per month and not made retroactive.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part
Orders
- Monthly child maintenance reduced from $825 to $374 commencing with the next monthly payment.
- No retroactive reduction; orders are prospective only.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment