Mandel v. Canada (Attorney General)

Mandel v. Canada (Attorney General)

The application was dismissed because (1) estoppel cannot be used to extinguish a statutory tax liability and there was no evidence of any agreement to waive interest, and (2) the ministerial delegate's conclusion that the applicant did not establish financial hardship was reasonably open to the delegate and not patently unreasonable, so the court would not interfere with the discretionary decision.

Citation
2003 FCT 402
Parties
Plaintiff/applicant: Sam Mandel; Defendant/respondent: Attorney General of Canada
Court
Federal Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
19 March 2003
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review of Ministerial Decision Under Income Tax Act / Decision on Application (dismissed)
Outcome
Application for judicial review dismissed
Legal Topics
Waiver of Interest Under S.220(3.1), Fairness Provisions, Financial Hardship, Estoppel Against the Crown, Standard of Review (patent Unreasonableness)
Source Language
English
Tax Law Administrative Law Judicial Review Waiver of Interest Under S.220(3.1) Fairness Provisions Financial Hardship Estoppel Against the Crown Standard of Review (patent Unreasonableness)

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sam Mandel

Plaintiff/applicant

Attorney General of Canada

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review of Ministerial Decision Under Income Tax Act / Decision on Application (dismissed)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Minister erred in refusing to waive interest under s.220(3.1) of the Income Tax Act
  2. 2 Whether an alleged agreement/estoppel prevented accrual of interest
  3. 3 Whether the delegate's refusal to waive interest on grounds of financial hardship was patently unreasonable

Ratio Decidendi

The application was dismissed because (1) estoppel cannot be used to extinguish a statutory tax liability and there was no evidence of any agreement to waive interest, and (2) the ministerial delegate's conclusion that the applicant did not establish financial hardship was reasonably open to the delegate and not patently unreasonable, so the court would not interfere with the discretionary decision.

Court Disposition

Application for judicial review dismissed

Orders

  • Application for judicial review dismissed
  • No costs awarded