Reference re Wartime Leasehold Regulations
The Court answered the reference in the negative because Parliament legitimately determined that a national emergency arising out of the war continued in certain aspects and enacted transitional statutes authorizing continuation of the Wartime Leasehold Regulations; absent clear and unmistakable evidence that the emergency had wholly ended, the courts will not declare such emergency legislation ultra vires even though it affects provincial property and civil rights.
- Citation
- [1950] SCR 124
- Parties
- Government: Attorney-General for Canada; Provincial Government: Attorney-General for Ontario; Provincial Government: Attorney-General for Quebec; Intervener (tenants): Tenants within Canada; Intervener (veterans Organization): The Canadian Legion of the British Empire Service League; Intervener (property Owners): Canadian Federation of Property Owners Association; Intervener (labour): Canadian Congress of Labour
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 1 March 1950
- Procedural Posture
- Reference Under S.55 of the Supreme Court Act / Advisory Opinion of the Supreme Court of Canada (final Disposition)
- Outcome
- Reference answered in the negative; Wartime Leasehold Regulations are not ultra vires either in whole or in part.
- Legal Topics
- War Measures Act, National Emergency Powers, Rent Control, Ultra Vires, Order in Council Continuation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney-General for Canada
Government
Attorney-General for Ontario
Provincial Government
Attorney-General for Quebec
Provincial Government
Tenants within Canada
Intervener (tenants)
The Canadian Legion of the British Empire Service League
Intervener (veterans Organization)
Canadian Federation of Property Owners Association
Intervener (property Owners)
Canadian Congress of Labour
Intervener (labour)
Procedural Posture
Reference Under S.55 of the Supreme Court Act / Advisory Opinion of the Supreme Court of Canada (final Disposition)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Wartime Leasehold Regulations are ultra vires in whole or in part
- 2 Whether Parliament may legislate in relation to property and civil rights during a continuing national emergency
- 3 Whether the post‑hostilities conditions constituted a continuing emergency justifying federal intrusion into provincial jurisdiction
Ratio Decidendi
The Court answered the reference in the negative because Parliament legitimately determined that a national emergency arising out of the war continued in certain aspects and enacted transitional statutes authorizing continuation of the Wartime Leasehold Regulations; absent clear and unmistakable evidence that the emergency had wholly ended, the courts will not declare such emergency legislation ultra vires even though it affects provincial property and civil rights.
Court Disposition
Reference answered in the negative; Wartime Leasehold Regulations are not ultra vires either in whole or in part.
Orders
- Question answered in the negative; no declaration of invalidity made
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment