Cowan v. Allen
Where a testator devises land in fee to a son and provides that if he dies without issue the residue shall revert to named brothers, the plain meaning of 'die without lawful issue' is death at any time, creating an executory devise over to the brothers; such a gift over to named brothers is valid and not void for repugnancy, the widow retains dower and the $50 annuity (not inconsistent) and the Devolution of Estates Act does not give the widow a distributive share of lands devised; a mortgagee improperly added in the master’s office may object later.
- Citation
- (1896) 26 SCR 292
- Parties
- Appellant Plaintiff: Samuel George Cowan; Appellant Defendant: Albert Wilberforce Cowan; Appellant Added Party (mortgagee): Sarah MacPherson; Respondent Administrator: W.F. Allen; Respondent Widow: Jeanne Cowan
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 1896
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Court of Appeal for Ontario Concerning Administration Action and Construction of Testator's Will / Final Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada; Judgment on Construction and Remitted Directions
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; master’s report varied and construction of will declared in favour of appellants on the executory devise point
- Legal Topics
- Will Construction, Executory Devise, Dower, Annuity, Restraint on Marriage, Devolution of Estates Act, Practice Parties Added in Master's Office
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Samuel George Cowan
Appellant Plaintiff
Albert Wilberforce Cowan
Appellant Defendant
Sarah MacPherson
Appellant Added Party (mortgagee)
W.F. Allen
Respondent Administrator
Jeanne Cowan
Respondent Widow
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Court of Appeal for Ontario Concerning Administration Action and Construction of Testator's Will / Final Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada; Judgment on Construction and Remitted Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether devisee (Alexander) took absolute fee or fee defeasible by executory devise to brothers on dying without issue
- 2 Proper construction of phrase 'die without lawful issue' (confined to testator's lifetime or at any time)
- 3 Whether gift over to brothers was void for repugnancy
Ratio Decidendi
Where a testator devises land in fee to a son and provides that if he dies without issue the residue shall revert to named brothers, the plain meaning of 'die without lawful issue' is death at any time, creating an executory devise over to the brothers; such a gift over to named brothers is valid and not void for repugnancy, the widow retains dower and the $50 annuity (not inconsistent) and the Devolution of Estates Act does not give the widow a distributive share of lands devised; a mortgagee improperly added in the master’s office may object later.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; master’s report varied and construction of will declared in favour of appellants on the executory devise point
Orders
- Motion to vary the master’s report ought to have been allowed
- Construction declared: devise to Alexander subject to executory devise over to brothers on his death without lawful issue at any time; widow entitled to dower and to $50 annuity so long as she remains unmarried; Devolution of Estates Act does not give widow a distributive share of devised lands
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment