Quebec Ry. L. & P. Co. v. Canadian Pacific Ry. Co.
Compensation paid under the Quebec Workmen's Compensation Act to the signalman is an expenditure within the meaning of the Board of Railway Commissioners' order that the respondent must employ and pay signalmen at the joint expense; therefore the appellant must reimburse one half of that compensation.
- Citation
- [1926] SCR 288
- Parties
- Appellant (defendant): Quebec Railway Light & Power Company; Respondent (plaintiff): Canadian Pacific Railway Company
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 1926
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From Court of King’s Bench, Quebec (appeal Side)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Workmen's Compensation, Joint Liability for Operational Expenses, Railway Crossing Interlocking Obligations, Statutory Employment Obligations Vs Tort
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Quebec Railway Light & Power Company
Appellant (defendant)
Canadian Pacific Railway Company
Respondent (plaintiff)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From Court of King’s Bench, Quebec (appeal Side)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether compensation paid under the Workmen's Compensation Act is an expenditure within the Board of Railway Commissioners' order requiring joint payment of signalmen expenses
- 2 Whether the appellant is liable to reimburse one half of compensation and related payments made by the respondent
- 3 Whether the workman's right to compensation arises out of tort or out of a statutory contract of employment
Ratio Decidendi
Compensation paid under the Quebec Workmen's Compensation Act to the signalman is an expenditure within the meaning of the Board of Railway Commissioners' order that the respondent must employ and pay signalmen at the joint expense; therefore the appellant must reimburse one half of that compensation.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Appellant ordered to reimburse one half of the compensation paid to the injured signalman.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment