R. v. MacKenzie
The revocation was cancelled because the viva voce evidence at the s.74 hearing undermined and exposed the unreliability of the hearsay material on which the CFO principally relied; given all relevant evidence the CFO's decision was not reasonable and therefore not justified.
- Citation
- 2004 NSPC 50
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty The Queen; Applicant: Aaron Keith MacKenzie
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Firearm Application / Section 74 Review Hearing of CFO Decision
- Outcome
- Revocation of firearms licence cancelled; CFO decision set aside
- Legal Topics
- Firearms Licence Revocation, Standard of Review, Public Safety Assessment, Evidentiary Weight of Hearsay, Peace Bond
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty The Queen
Crown
Aaron Keith MacKenzie
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Firearm Application / Section 74 Review Hearing of CFO Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Chief Firearms Officer's revocation of the applicant's firearms licence was reasonable
- 2 Whether the applicant posed a danger to himself or others under s.5(2)(b) and (c) of the Firearms Act
- 3 What weight to afford hearsay police-file material versus viva voce testimony
Ratio Decidendi
The revocation was cancelled because the viva voce evidence at the s.74 hearing undermined and exposed the unreliability of the hearsay material on which the CFO principally relied; given all relevant evidence the CFO's decision was not reasonable and therefore not justified.
Court Disposition
Revocation of firearms licence cancelled; CFO decision set aside
Orders
- Revocation of the firearms licence of Aaron Keith MacKenzie is cancelled pursuant to s.76(c)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment