British Columbia (Forests and Range) v. Okanagan Indian Band
The respondents failed to establish a material change in circumstances that would have led the court to make a different severance order in 2007; accordingly the 2007 severance order remains in force and the trial will proceed first on the justification of the admitted aboriginal right. Proposed amendments to expand...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2010 BCSC 1088
- Parties
- Petitioner: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia as represented by the Minister of Forests; Respondents: Chief Dan Wilson in his personal capacity and as representative of the Okanagan Indian Band and all other persons engaged in the cutting, damaging or destroying of Crown timber at Timber Sale Licence A57614
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 3 August 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (aboriginal Title; Forestry; Constitutional; Interlocutory) / Application to Reconsider Severance Order, Application to Amend Pleadings; Interlocutory in Chambers
- Outcome
- Application to reconsider the July 10, 2007 severance order dismissed; trial to proceed under existing severance order on the issue of justification of the admitted aboriginal right; proposed amendments to pleadings largely allowed; counterclaim for declaration of aboriginal title stayed pending outcome of severed...
- Legal Topics
- Aboriginal Title, Aboriginal Rights, Severance of Issues, Advance Costs Order, Justification Under S.35, Preservation of Evidence, Amendment of Pleadings, Prejudice and Delay
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia as represented by the Minister of Forests
Petitioner
Chief Dan Wilson in his personal capacity and as representative of the Okanagan Indian Band and all other persons engaged in the cutting, damaging or destroying of Crown timber at Timber Sale Licence A57614
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil (aboriginal Title; Forestry; Constitutional; Interlocutory) / Application to Reconsider Severance Order, Application to Amend Pleadings; Interlocutory in Chambers
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there has been a material change in circumstances warranting reconsideration of the 2007 severance order
- 2 Whether the respondents' streamlining proposal to try title first and defer justification is appropriate
- 3 Whether proposed amendments (including a declaration of aboriginal title to the Browns Creek Watershed) should be allowed and whether the existing advance costs order should be extended to them
Ratio Decidendi
The respondents failed to establish a material change in circumstances that would have led the court to make a different severance order in 2007; accordingly the 2007 severance order remains in force and the trial will proceed first on the justification of the admitted aboriginal right. Proposed amendments to expand the case (including a declaration of aboriginal title to the Watershed) are largely allowed but the amended counterclaim is stayed pending the outcome of the severed trial and a separate hearing to determine whether the existing advance costs order should be extended to the amended pleadings.
Court Disposition
Application to reconsider the July 10, 2007 severance order dismissed; trial to proceed under existing severance order on the issue of justification of the admitted aboriginal right; proposed amendments to pleadings largely allowed; counterclaim for declaration of aboriginal title stayed pending outcome of severed...
Orders
- Application to set aside and vary the 2007 severance order dismissed
- Trial to proceed in accordance with the existing severance order on justification of the admitted aboriginal right
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment