Q.N.S. Paper Co. v. Chartwell Shipping Ltd.

Q.N.S. Paper Co. v. Chartwell Shipping Ltd.

Canadian maritime law governs stevedoring contracts; absent specific statutory rule the issue is decided by construing the contract to determine parties' intention; Chartwell consistently and unambiguously represented it was acting "as agent only" and therefore was not personally liable; provincial superior courts must apply the same uniform Canadian maritime law as the Federal Court.

Citation
[1989] 2 SCR 683
Parties
Appellant/managing Operator and Agent: Chartwell Shipping Limited; Respondent/stevedore and Local Ship Agent: Q.N.S. Paper Company Limited
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
28 September 1989
Procedural Posture
Maritime Law Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada (re Hearing)
Outcome
Appeal allowed; judgment of Quebec Court of Appeal quashed; judgment of Quebec Superior Court restored
Legal Topics
Agent Liability, Undisclosed/partially Disclosed Principal, Mandate, Application of Civil Code Vs Common Law, Federal Court Act Ss.2 and 22(2)(m)
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Chartwell Shipping Limited

Appellant/managing Operator and Agent

Q.N.S. Paper Company Limited

Respondent/stevedore and Local Ship Agent

Procedural Posture

Maritime Law Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada (re Hearing)

  1. 1 Whether an agent of an unnamed or partially disclosed principal is personally liable on a contract when the agent expressly indicates it is acting only as agent
  2. 2 Which body of law governs (Canadian maritime law: common law, civil law or composite)
  3. 3 Whether provincial superior courts must apply the same Canadian maritime law as the Federal Court

Ratio Decidendi

Canadian maritime law governs stevedoring contracts; absent specific statutory rule the issue is decided by construing the contract to determine parties' intention; Chartwell consistently and unambiguously represented it was acting "as agent only" and therefore was not personally liable; provincial superior courts must apply the same uniform Canadian maritime law as the Federal Court.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; judgment of Quebec Court of Appeal quashed; judgment of Quebec Superior Court restored

Orders

  • Appeal allowed
  • Judgment of the Quebec Court of Appeal set aside