Butterfield v. Canada (Attorney General)

Butterfield v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Court found the appellant did not demonstrate any merit to his argument and that the tribunal properly exercised its jurisdiction in dismissing the appeal for failure to appear; accordingly the appeal was dismissed with costs.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2007 FCA 290
Parties
Appellant: Aidan Butterfield; Respondent: Attorney General of Canada
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
17 September 2007
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Tribunal Decision / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Tribunal Jurisdiction, Failure to Attend Hearing, Costs
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Appeals Tribunal Jurisdiction Failure to Attend Hearing Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Aidan Butterfield

Appellant

Attorney General of Canada

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Tribunal Decision / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the tribunal properly exercised its jurisdiction in dismissing the appeal for failure to appear
  2. 2 Whether the appellant's challenge to the tribunal's dismissal had legal merit

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found the appellant did not demonstrate any merit to his argument and that the tribunal properly exercised its jurisdiction in dismissing the appeal for failure to appear; accordingly the appeal was dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs