Clemente v. Air Canada
The Tribunal concluded that Rule 6 requires the Respondent to serve and file a List of documents and a List of privileged documents with the basis for privilege within 30 days because the lists are necessary to ensure an expedient, fair process and to allow the Complainant to defend his case; the Tribunal accepted the Respondent’s undertaking to search for and promptly provide any further documents from April–December 2016 and thus made no order on that point; the Tribunal also found disclosure of the names and job titles for the individuals identified by initials in the management notes is necessary because those individuals were involved in decisions central to the complaint and their...
- Citation
- 2022 CHRT 29
- Parties
- Complainant: Giuseppe Clemente; Commission: Canadian Human Rights Commission; Respondent: Air Canada
- Court
- Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 9 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Canadian Human Rights Act Complaint / Interim Ruling (motion for Disclosure)
- Outcome
- Motion granted in part; orders issued
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure, Document Production, Privilege, Discovery, Procedural Fairness
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Giuseppe Clemente
Complainant
Canadian Human Rights Commission
Commission
Air Canada
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Canadian Human Rights Act Complaint / Interim Ruling (motion for Disclosure)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent must serve a List of documents and a List of privileged documents
- 2 Whether the Respondent must disclose emails/documents for April 2016 to December 2016 referenced in management notes
- 3 Whether the Respondent must identify by name and job title employees referred to by initials in Air Canada Management Notes
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal concluded that Rule 6 requires the Respondent to serve and file a List of documents and a List of privileged documents with the basis for privilege within 30 days because the lists are necessary to ensure an expedient, fair process and to allow the Complainant to defend his case; the Tribunal accepted the Respondent’s undertaking to search for and promptly provide any further documents from April–December 2016 and thus made no order on that point; the Tribunal also found disclosure of the names and job titles for the individuals identified by initials in the management notes is necessary because those individuals were involved in decisions central to the complaint and their...
Court Disposition
Motion granted in part; orders issued
Orders
- Respondent must serve and file a List of documents in its possession that relate to a fact or issue raised in the complaint, in compliance with Rule 6(1)(d), within 30 days of notification of the decision.
- Respondent must serve and file a List of privileged documents and the basis for the privilege in compliance with Rule 6(1)(e) within 30 days of notification of the decision.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment