Italy v. Andriano

Italy v. Andriano

The Minister's decision to refuse adjournment and to find no error in surrendering the applicant was within ministerial discretion; the Minister considered the submissions regarding in absentia proceedings and pending ECHR proceedings and made no reviewable error, so the judicial review application must be dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2011 ONCA 44
Parties
Respondent: Attorney General of Canada on behalf of the Republic of Italy; Applicant: Albano Andriano
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
19 January 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Extradition / Application for Judicial Review of the Minister of Justice's Decision to Surrender the Applicant for Extradition (court of Appeal)
Outcome
Application for judicial review dismissed; request for 60-day adjournment denied.
Legal Topics
Surrender, In Absentia Proceedings, European Court of Human Rights, Ministerial Discretion, Adjournment
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Extradition Judicial Review Human Rights Surrender In Absentia Proceedings European Court of Human Rights Ministerial Discretion +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Attorney General of Canada on behalf of the Republic of Italy

Respondent

Albano Andriano

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Extradition / Application for Judicial Review of the Minister of Justice's Decision to Surrender the Applicant for Extradition (court of Appeal)

  1. 1 Whether the European Court of Human Rights had given the equivalent of leave to appeal or whether there was a reasonable prospect of a decision within 60 days
  2. 2 Whether Italy's prosecution in absentia after a formal extradition request demonstrated disrespect for the Canadian extradition process sufficient to require intervention
  3. 3 Whether the Minister erred by failing to adjourn proceedings or seek assurances because of pending ECHR proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The Minister's decision to refuse adjournment and to find no error in surrendering the applicant was within ministerial discretion; the Minister considered the submissions regarding in absentia proceedings and pending ECHR proceedings and made no reviewable error, so the judicial review application must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application for judicial review dismissed; request for 60-day adjournment denied.

Orders

  • Application for judicial review dismissed.
  • Request for a 60-day adjournment denied.