Gaham v. Canada

Gaham v. Canada

The appellate court affirmed that a decision dismissing a preliminary objection at the interlocutory stage is not res judicata as to jurisdiction where no definitive ruling on jurisdiction was made; accordingly the trial judge correctly held the earlier decision was not res judicata and the appeal is dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2002 FCA 329
Parties
Appellant: ALI GAHAM; Respondent: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
12 September 2002
Procedural Posture
Appeal to Federal Court of Appeal / Judgment on Preliminary Objection (appeal Stage)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Preliminary Objection, Res Judicata, Jurisdiction, Dismissal With Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Administrative Law Public Law Preliminary Objection Res Judicata Jurisdiction Dismissal With Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ALI GAHAM

Appellant

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal to Federal Court of Appeal / Judgment on Preliminary Objection (appeal Stage)

  1. 1 Whether a decision dismissing a preliminary objection is res judicata on the issue of jurisdiction
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge properly held that the earlier decision of Denault J. was not res judicata as to jurisdiction
  3. 3 Whether the appeal should be dismissed with costs

Ratio Decidendi

The appellate court affirmed that a decision dismissing a preliminary objection at the interlocutory stage is not res judicata as to jurisdiction where no definitive ruling on jurisdiction was made; accordingly the trial judge correctly held the earlier decision was not res judicata and the appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs