Gillis v. New Glasgow (Town)
The court granted summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs' claim because any earlier alleged agreement was varied and superseded by the Amended Development Agreement and Agreement of Purchase and Sale executed July‑August 2005 and the plaintiffs, by continuing negotiations and accepting conveyance, were estopped from asserting inconsistent prior claims; the plaintiffs' negligence allegations related solely to pre‑variation events and therefore had no real chance of success after the parties' final agreements; the defendant proved conversion of the $6,500 deposit and was entitled to judgment on that counterclaim while the balance of the counterclaim for damages remained triable or...
- Citation
- 2008 NSSC 46
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Allan M. Gillis; Plaintiff: AMG Development Incorporated; Defendant; Counterclaimant: Town of New Glasgow (a Municipal Corporation)
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil: Contract and Tort (negligence) Involving Municipal Development Agreements / Interlocutory Summary Judgment Application (decision on Summary Judgment and Counterclaim)
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' action dismissed on summary judgment; Defendant awarded judgment on counterclaim for $6,500; remainder of Defendant's counterclaim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Variation and Waiver of Contracts, Estoppel by Representation, Statute of Frauds, Development Agreements, Conversion of Deposit
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Allan M. Gillis
Plaintiff
AMG Development Incorporated
Plaintiff
Town of New Glasgow (a Municipal Corporation)
Defendant; Counterclaimant
Procedural Posture
Civil: Contract and Tort (negligence) Involving Municipal Development Agreements / Interlocutory Summary Judgment Application (decision on Summary Judgment and Counterclaim)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was an enforceable agreement to convey the property prior to July 2005 or whether later agreements varied and superseded any prior agreement
- 2 Whether the plaintiffs are estopped from asserting breach of any earlier inconsistent agreement
- 3 Whether the plaintiffs' negligence claim based on pre‑2005 events survives the July‑August 2005 agreements
Ratio Decidendi
The court granted summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs' claim because any earlier alleged agreement was varied and superseded by the Amended Development Agreement and Agreement of Purchase and Sale executed July‑August 2005 and the plaintiffs, by continuing negotiations and accepting conveyance, were estopped from asserting inconsistent prior claims; the plaintiffs' negligence allegations related solely to pre‑variation events and therefore had no real chance of success after the parties' final agreements; the defendant proved conversion of the $6,500 deposit and was entitled to judgment on that counterclaim while the balance of the counterclaim for damages remained triable or...
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' action dismissed on summary judgment; Defendant awarded judgment on counterclaim for $6,500; remainder of Defendant's counterclaim dismissed.
Orders
- Plaintiffs' claim dismissed.
- Judgment for Defendant against Plaintiffs in the amount of $6,500.00 (deposit) on the counterclaim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment