Orcheson v. Canada
The appellants failed to persuade the Court that it should interfere with the underlying decisions; therefore the appeals are dismissed and costs are awarded to the respondent.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2005 FCA 200
- Parties
- Appellant: Allan Orcheson; Appellant: Lorna Orcheson; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen
- Court
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal / Judgment (appeal Dismissed)
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal of Appeal, Costs Award
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Allan Orcheson
Appellant
Lorna Orcheson
Appellant
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal / Judgment (appeal Dismissed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court should interfere with the underlying decisions
- 2 Whether the appellants demonstrated grounds for overturning the decisions
- 3 Whether costs should be awarded to the respondent
Ratio Decidendi
The appellants failed to persuade the Court that it should interfere with the underlying decisions; therefore the appeals are dismissed and costs are awarded to the respondent.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- Appeals dismissed
- One set of costs to the Respondents
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Orcheson v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2005-05-26 Neutral citation 2005 FCA 200 File numbers A-314-04, A-315-04 Decision Content Date: 20050526 Dockets: A-314-04 A-315-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 200 CORAM: LINDEN J.A. ROTHSTEIN J.A. NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: ALLAN ORCHESON Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent AND BETWEEN: LORNA ORCHESON Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on May 25, 2005. Judgment delivered at Toronto, Ontario, May 26, 2005. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: LINDEN J.A. ROTHSTEIN J.A. NOËL J.A. Date: 20050526 Dockets: A-314-04 A-315-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 200 CORAM: LINDEN J.A. ROTHSTEIN J.A. NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: ALLAN ORCHESON Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent AND BETWEEN: LORNA ORCHESON Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT THE COURT [1] Despite the appellants' lengthy and detailed critique of the reasons for decision and the records in these matters, the Court has not been persuaded that it should interfere in the decisions in these cases. [2] The appeals will, therefore, be dismissed with one set of costs to the Respondents. "A. M. Linden" J.A. "Marshall Rothstein" J.A. "Marc Noël" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKETS: A-314-04 A-315-04 STYLES OF CAUSE: ALLAN ORCHESON Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent LORNA ORCHESON Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: MAY 25, 2005 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: (LINDEN, ROTHSTEIN & NOËL JJ.A.) DATED: MAY 26, 2005 APPEARANCES BY: Mr. Allan Orcheson Ms. Lorna Orcheson FOR THE APPELLANTS, ON THEIR OWN BEHALF Mr. André LeBlanc FOR THE RESPONDENTS SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Allan Orcheson Lorna Orcheson Toronto, Ontario FOR THE APPELLANTS, ON THEIR OWN BEHALF John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENTS