Biscaia v. Office Of The Umpire Employment Insruance Act Cub 76149 Bcpbank

Biscaia v. Office Of The Umpire Employment Insruance Act Cub 76149 Bcpbank

The application for reconsideration of the costs orders is dismissed because there is no basis to transfer liability for those costs to the Employment Insurance Commission, which neither instituted the judicial review nor named the parties.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2007 FCA 257
Parties
Applicant: Ana Paula Biscaia; Respondent: Office of the Umpire Employment Insvruance Act CUB 76149 BCPBANK/David Bell, Solicitor
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
12 July 2007
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review of Umpire Decision Under Employment Insurance Scheme / Reconsideration of Costs Orders; Motion Dealt With in Writing
Outcome
Application for reconsideration dismissed.
Legal Topics
Reconsideration, Costs Orders, Liability for Costs, Procedural Disposition
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Employment Insurance Judicial Review Costs Reconsideration Costs Orders Liability for Costs Procedural Disposition

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ana Paula Biscaia

Applicant

Office of the Umpire Employment Insvruance Act CUB 76149 BCPBANK/David Bell, Solicitor

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review of Umpire Decision Under Employment Insurance Scheme / Reconsideration of Costs Orders; Motion Dealt With in Writing

  1. 1 Whether orders for costs previously made against the applicant should be reconsidered
  2. 2 Whether the Employment Insurance Commission can be ordered to bear the costs imposed on the applicant

Ratio Decidendi

The application for reconsideration of the costs orders is dismissed because there is no basis to transfer liability for those costs to the Employment Insurance Commission, which neither instituted the judicial review nor named the parties.

Court Disposition

Application for reconsideration dismissed.

Orders

  • Application for reconsideration of costs dismissed.
  • Costs orders previously made against the applicant are maintained.