Ashby v. L'Hereux

Ashby v. L'Hereux

The defendant's termination was unreasonable; the claimant performed and documented 41 hours of work and incurred materials and HST; absent proof of improper work or payment, the claimant is entitled to judgment for the unpaid labour, materials and related costs totaling $1,692.32; no credit for the alleged $300 without evidence.

Citation
2012 NSSM 61
Parties
Claimant: D. Rodney Ashby; Defendant: Andrea L'Hereux
Court
Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
25 October 2012
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Court / Decision After Hearing
Outcome
Judgment for Claimant in the amount of $1,692.32
Legal Topics
Time and Materials Contract, Payment for Services, Termination of Services, Hst/tax on Services
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

D. Rodney Ashby

Claimant

Andrea L'Hereux

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Small Claims Court / Decision After Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the defendant validly terminated the contractor's services
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to payment for labour and materials under a time-and-materials contract
  3. 3 Whether the defendant is entitled to a $300 offset for alleged cash left in toolbox

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant's termination was unreasonable; the claimant performed and documented 41 hours of work and incurred materials and HST; absent proof of improper work or payment, the claimant is entitled to judgment for the unpaid labour, materials and related costs totaling $1,692.32; no credit for the alleged $300 without evidence.

Court Disposition

Judgment for Claimant in the amount of $1,692.32

Orders

  • Defendant to pay Claimant $1,692.32 for labour, materials, HST and claim/serve costs.
  • No credit is allowed at this time for the alleged $300 cash absent evidence; if the cash is later discovered the claimant should voluntarily credit the defendant when settling.