MacLean v. MacIsaac

MacLean v. MacIsaac

On the evidence and witness testimony the court found a binding verbal agreement that the Claimant's name would be added to the deed in return for his time, labour and expenditures; the Defendant failed to prove her counterclaims (misuse of insurance funds, extortion/abuse); accordingly the Claimant was entitled to relief — either execution of a Warranty Deed adding him as joint owner or a monetary award of $24,999.99 — and the Defendant's defence and counterclaim were dismissed.

Citation
2017 NSSM 78
Parties
Claimant: John Joseph MacLean; Defendant: Anne Hazel MacIsaac
Court
Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
14 November 2017
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Court / Adjudication (decision After Hearing)
Outcome
Defendant's Defence and Counterclaim dismissed; Claimant granted judgment and equitable alternative relief
Legal Topics
Enforcement of Verbal Agreement, Ownership/deed Transfer, Quantum Meruit / Restitution, Counterclaim Dismissal, Evidence and Credibility
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Joseph MacLean

Claimant

Anne Hazel MacIsaac

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Small Claims Court / Adjudication (decision After Hearing)

  1. 1 Whether a verbal agreement existed to add the Claimant's name to the deed in exchange for renovations
  2. 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to monetary compensation or equitable relief for renovations performed
  3. 3 Whether renovation funds came from the Defendant's brother's insurance proceeds and were misused by the Claimant

Ratio Decidendi

On the evidence and witness testimony the court found a binding verbal agreement that the Claimant's name would be added to the deed in return for his time, labour and expenditures; the Defendant failed to prove her counterclaims (misuse of insurance funds, extortion/abuse); accordingly the Claimant was entitled to relief — either execution of a Warranty Deed adding him as joint owner or a monetary award of $24,999.99 — and the Defendant's defence and counterclaim were dismissed.

Court Disposition

Defendant's Defence and Counterclaim dismissed; Claimant granted judgment and equitable alternative relief

Orders

  • Dismissal of the Defendant's Defence and Counterclaim
  • Judgment in favour of the Claimant: Defendant shall pay $24,999.99 to the Claimant or, alternatively, execute a Warranty Deed adding the Claimant as joint owner of 38 Pleasant St., North Sydney, NS along with the Defendant and Daniel Martin MacLean