McCartie v. Canada (National Revenue)
The Federal Court refused the extension because the appellant failed to provide a reasonable explanation for the lengthy delay, failed to demonstrate a continuous intention to proceed, and the underlying judicial review application was without merit; the Federal Court of Appeal found no reviewable error and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2012 FCA 304
- Parties
- Appellant: Annie McCartie; Respondent: The Minister of National Revenue (Attorney General of Canada)
- Court
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal / Appeal From Federal Court Decision Refusing an Extension of Time to File the Application Record
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time to File, Judicial Review, Charter Issues, Merits Assessment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Annie McCartie
Appellant
The Minister of National Revenue (Attorney General of Canada)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal / Appeal From Federal Court Decision Refusing an Extension of Time to File the Application Record
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an extension of time should be granted to file the Application Record
- 2 Whether the appellant provided a reasonable explanation for the lengthy delay
- 3 Whether the appellant demonstrated a continuous intention to proceed with the application
Ratio Decidendi
The Federal Court refused the extension because the appellant failed to provide a reasonable explanation for the lengthy delay, failed to demonstrate a continuous intention to proceed, and the underlying judicial review application was without merit; the Federal Court of Appeal found no reviewable error and dismissed the appeal with costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
McCartie v. Canada (National Revenue) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2012-11-19 Neutral citation 2012 FCA 304 File numbers A-95-12 Decision Content Date: 20121119 Docket: A-95-12 Citation: 2012 FCA 304 CORAM: BLAIS C.J. NADON J.A. TRUDEL J.A. BETWEEN: ANNIE MCCARTIE Appellant and THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE (ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA) Respondent Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, on November 19, 2012. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia, on November 19, 2012. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A. Date: 20121119 Docket: A-95-12 Citation: 2012 FCA 304 CORAM: BLAIS C.J. NADON J.A. TRUDEL J.A. BETWEEN: ANNIE MCCARTIE Appellant and THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE (ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA) Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia, on November 19, 2012) NADON J.A. [1] Mrs. McCartie, the appellant, is appealing the decision of Noël J. (“the Judge”) of the Federal Court, dated March 15, 2012, wherein he refused to grant her an extension of time to file her Application Record. More particularly, the Judge found that the appellant had not provided a reasonable explanation for the lengthy delay for the filing of her Application Record. He further found that she had not shown a continuous intention to proceed with her application. Lastly, but not the least, the Judge was of the view that the appellant’s judicial review application was without merit. [2] We see no basis to disagree with the Judge’s conclusions. Consequently, we have not been persuaded that he made a reviewable error which would allow us to intervene. [3] Before us, the appellant raised Charter issues and made a number of submissions based on these issues. Unfortunately for her, her submissions do not detract us from our view that the Judge was correct in concluding that her judicial review application was bound to fail. [4] For these reasons, the appeal will be dismissed with costs. "M. Nadon" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-95-12 STYLE OF CAUSE: ANNIE McCARTIE v. M.N.R. (A.G.C.) PLACE OF HEARING: Vancouver, British Columbia DATE OF HEARING: November 19, 2012 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: BLAIS C.J., NADON J.A. and TRUDEL J.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: NADON J.A. APPEARANCES: Annie McCartie Colin McCartie FOR THE APPELLANT David Everett Max Matas FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: N/A FOR THE APPELLANT William F. Pentney Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENT