R. I. v. Canada Employment Insurance Commission
The appellant failed to prove good cause for the entire delay under s.10(4) and, independently, failed to meet the mandatory s.7(2) insurable hours requirement (zero hours v. required 665 at a 6.9% unemployment rate); therefore the antedate is denied and the claim cannot be established.
- Citation
- 2016 SSTGDEI 96
- Parties
- Appellant (claimant): R. I.; Respondent (commission): Canada Employment Insurance Commission
- Court
- Social Security Tribunal of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Insurance Appeal / Social Security Tribunal General Division Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Antedating Claims, Qualification for Benefits, Good Cause for Delay, Insurable Hours Requirement
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R. I.
Appellant (claimant)
Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Respondent (commission)
Procedural Posture
Employment Insurance Appeal / Social Security Tribunal General Division Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the initial claim can be antedated under subsection 10(4) of the Employment Insurance Act
- 2 Whether the appellant had sufficient insurable hours to qualify under section 7 of the Employment Insurance Act
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to prove good cause for the entire delay under s.10(4) and, independently, failed to meet the mandatory s.7(2) insurable hours requirement (zero hours v. required 665 at a 6.9% unemployment rate); therefore the antedate is denied and the claim cannot be established.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Antedate request denied
- Claim for Employment Insurance benefits denied due to insufficient insurable hours
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment