Pontillo v. Zinger

Pontillo v. Zinger

The motion judge's reasons contained no error; the appeal is dismissed and the respondents are entitled to costs as awarded.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2011 ONCA 416
Parties
Appellant: Antonietta Pontillo; Respondent: Don Zinger; Respondent: Todd Schaefer; Respondent: Garda World Security Corporation; Respondent: Dominion of Canada Insurance; Respondent: Cindy Parkin
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
1 June 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Motion Judge Endorsement, Dismissal of Appeal, Costs Award
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appeal Costs Motion Judge Endorsement Dismissal of Appeal Costs Award

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Antonietta Pontillo

Appellant

Don Zinger

Respondent

Todd Schaefer

Respondent

Garda World Security Corporation

Respondent

Dominion of Canada Insurance

Respondent

Cindy Parkin

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the motion judge erred in law or fact in the reasons
  2. 2 Whether the appeal should be allowed
  3. 3 What costs, if any, should be awarded to the respondents

Ratio Decidendi

The motion judge's reasons contained no error; the appeal is dismissed and the respondents are entitled to costs as awarded.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.
  • Costs to Dominion et al - $6000 all inclusive.