TB4-01591
The RAD set aside the RPD decision because the RPD failed as a matter of law to analyze whether the evidence it found credible established a well-founded fear under s.96 and a risk to life under s.97, and further made an unreasonable finding on availability of state protection; on review the RAD found the credible evidence sufficient and substituted a finding that the appellants are Convention refugees and persons in need of protection.
- Citation
- TB4-01591
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellants (names redacted)
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Appeal to Refugee Appeal Division / Final Decision of RAD Substituting RPD Determination
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; RAD sets aside RPD decision and substitutes finding that the appellants are Convention refugees and persons in need of protection
- Legal Topics
- Convention Refugee Status, State Protection, Credibility Assessment, Standard of Review
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellants (names redacted)
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Refugee Appeal to Refugee Appeal Division / Final Decision of RAD Substituting RPD Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 appropriate standard of review for RAD appeals
- 2 whether RPD conducted complete risk analysis under s.96 and s.97 IRPA
- 3 whether RPD's state protection analysis was reasonable
Ratio Decidendi
The RAD set aside the RPD decision because the RPD failed as a matter of law to analyze whether the evidence it found credible established a well-founded fear under s.96 and a risk to life under s.97, and further made an unreasonable finding on availability of state protection; on review the RAD found the credible evidence sufficient and substituted a finding that the appellants are Convention refugees and persons in need of protection.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; RAD sets aside RPD decision and substitutes finding that the appellants are Convention refugees and persons in need of protection
Orders
- Set aside the determination of the Refugee Protection Division
- Substitute a determination that the appellants are Convention refugees and persons in need of protection
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment