British Columbia (Public Guardian and Trustee) v. Strand
The chambers judge erred in finding the Public Guardian's statutory fees excessive because he misapprehended the purpose and operation of the capital commission and failed to consider fee accrual over the life of the trusts; it was also improper to impose trusteeship on Murphy Battista without notice or consent; accordingly the April 14, 2008 order was set aside and the funds were ordered delivered to the Public Guardian to hold in trust until each infant attains majority subject to Infants Act s.14(1).
- Citation
- 2009 BCCA 158
- Parties
- Appellant / Plaintiff: Public Guardian and Trustee of the Province of British Columbia (litigation guardian for Natalie Beaurivage and April Beaurivage); Respondent / Defendant: Dale Strand; Respondent / Defendant: Joseph Richard Emard
- Court
- British Columbia Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 8 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal Concerning Appointment of Trustee and Approval of Infant Settlements / Court of Appeal Hearing and Judgment on Appeal From Chambers Decision (2008 BCSC 441)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; April 14, 2008 chambers order set aside; Murphy Battista ordered to deliver funds to Public Guardian; Public Guardian to hold funds in trust until each infant attains 19 years subject to Infants Act s.14(1); no costs awarded.
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Trustee, Public Guardian Fees, Approval of Infant Settlements, Conflict of Interest in Recommendations by Public Trustee, Judicial Oversight of Chambers Orders
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Public Guardian and Trustee of the Province of British Columbia (litigation guardian for Natalie Beaurivage and April Beaurivage)
Appellant / Plaintiff
Dale Strand
Respondent / Defendant
Joseph Richard Emard
Respondent / Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal Concerning Appointment of Trustee and Approval of Infant Settlements / Court of Appeal Hearing and Judgment on Appeal From Chambers Decision (2008 BCSC 441)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the chambers judge erred in finding the Public Guardian's statutorily prescribed fees excessive compared to private trustees
- 2 Whether it was proper for the chambers judge to order a law firm (Murphy Battista) to hold trust funds without notice or consent
- 3 Whether the Public Guardian should be appointed trustee of the infant settlement funds
Ratio Decidendi
The chambers judge erred in finding the Public Guardian's statutory fees excessive because he misapprehended the purpose and operation of the capital commission and failed to consider fee accrual over the life of the trusts; it was also improper to impose trusteeship on Murphy Battista without notice or consent; accordingly the April 14, 2008 order was set aside and the funds were ordered delivered to the Public Guardian to hold in trust until each infant attains majority subject to Infants Act s.14(1).
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; April 14, 2008 chambers order set aside; Murphy Battista ordered to deliver funds to Public Guardian; Public Guardian to hold funds in trust until each infant attains 19 years subject to Infants Act s.14(1); no costs awarded.
Orders
- Appeal allowed without costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment