Bureau des Commissaires d'écoles Catholiques romaines de la cité de Québec v. Bilodeau
The 18 May 1923 resolution was an amendment to the existing salaried contract and did not revive or incorporate the statutory tariff; the salary expressly covered all fees including remuneration for plans and specifications, and the appellant was only liable for the fixed salary and the 1.5% commission applicable to the value of work actually completed at the architect's death, not for additional tariff-based fees.
- Citation
- [1925] SCR 519
- Parties
- Defendant Appellant: Bureau des Commissaires d'écoles Catholiques romaines de la cité de Québec; Plaintiffs Respondents: P. Bilodeau and Others
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 4 June 1925
- Procedural Posture
- Contract Appeal / Judgment on Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed with costs; judgment of the Court of King's Bench reversed and judgment of the Superior Court restored
- Legal Topics
- Architect's Commission, Salary Inclusion, Contract Interpretation, Effect of Death on Contractual Rights, Statutory Tariff of Fees
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bureau des Commissaires d'écoles Catholiques romaines de la cité de Québec
Defendant Appellant
P. Bilodeau and Others
Plaintiffs Respondents
Procedural Posture
Contract Appeal / Judgment on Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 18 May 1923 resolution created an independent contractual right to commissions payable beyond the agreed annual salary
- 2 Whether the estate of the deceased architect was entitled to additional fees under the statutory architect tariff for plans and specifications despite an existing salaried contract
- 3 Whether commission entitlement is to be calculated on work actually completed at death or on total contract value
Ratio Decidendi
The 18 May 1923 resolution was an amendment to the existing salaried contract and did not revive or incorporate the statutory tariff; the salary expressly covered all fees including remuneration for plans and specifications, and the appellant was only liable for the fixed salary and the 1.5% commission applicable to the value of work actually completed at the architect's death, not for additional tariff-based fees.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed with costs; judgment of the Court of King's Bench reversed and judgment of the Superior Court restored
Orders
- Appeal allowed with costs
- Decision of the Court of King's Bench, Appeal Side, set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment