R. v. Tetreault
The cumulative effect of independent informant information, surveillance observations and corroborative seizures from third-party attendees established reasonable and probable grounds to arrest the accused for trafficking in cocaine; the subsequent search incident to that lawful arrest was reasonable and lawful and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2007 BCSC 1624
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Accused: Michael David Tetreault
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 9 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Controlled Drugs and Substances Act Offences / Voir Dire (pre Trial Admissibility Ruling)
- Outcome
- Arrest lawful; search incidental to arrest lawful; drug evidence admissible; weapon count not proceeded with by Crown (no evidence).
- Legal Topics
- Arrest Without Warrant, Search Incidental to Arrest, Reasonable and Probable Grounds, Exclusion of Evidence Under S.24(2)
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Michael David Tetreault
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Controlled Drugs and Substances Act Offences / Voir Dire (pre Trial Admissibility Ruling)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether police had reasonable and probable grounds to arrest the accused for trafficking in cocaine
- 2 Whether the warrantless search incidental to arrest was authorized by law and conducted reasonably under s.8 of the Charter
- 3 Whether evidence seized should be excluded under s.24(2) of the Charter
Ratio Decidendi
The cumulative effect of independent informant information, surveillance observations and corroborative seizures from third-party attendees established reasonable and probable grounds to arrest the accused for trafficking in cocaine; the subsequent search incident to that lawful arrest was reasonable and lawful and the seized evidence is admissible.
Court Disposition
Arrest lawful; search incidental to arrest lawful; drug evidence admissible; weapon count not proceeded with by Crown (no evidence).
Orders
- Evidence seized during search admitted for trial.
- Charge for possession of a prohibited weapon without a licence dismissed by Crown (no evidence).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment