Zins v. Canada
The application for a stay was dismissed because the appeal addresses the substantive tax liability (including reassessment for $43,614) and its resolution could dispose of the collection proceedings, so delay was unjustified.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2006 FCA 306
- Parties
- Appellant: Arthur Roman Zins; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen
- Court
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 15 September 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / Motion for Stay Pending Judicial Review Dismissed; Motion Dealt With in Writing
- Outcome
- Application for a stay dismissed; costs awarded to respondent.
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Proceedings, Tax Reassessment, Judicial Review, Collection of Tax Debt
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Arthur Roman Zins
Appellant
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / Motion for Stay Pending Judicial Review Dismissed; Motion Dealt With in Writing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a stay of the appeal should be granted pending judicial review
- 2 Whether the Federal Court judicial review on collection would directly affect the appeal on substantive tax liability
Ratio Decidendi
The application for a stay was dismissed because the appeal addresses the substantive tax liability (including reassessment for $43,614) and its resolution could dispose of the collection proceedings, so delay was unjustified.
Court Disposition
Application for a stay dismissed; costs awarded to respondent.
Orders
- Stay application dismissed
- Costs to respondent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Zins v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2006-09-15 Neutral citation 2006 FCA 306 File numbers A-634-05 Decision Content Date: 20060915 Docket: A-634-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 306 Present: NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: ARTHUR ROMAN ZINS Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties. Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario on September 15, 2006. REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NOËL J.A. Date: 20060915 Docket: A-634-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 306 Present: NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: ARTHUR ROMAN ZINS Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER [1] The appellant seeks a stay of this appeal pending the hearing and disposition of a judicial review application before the Federal Court in file T-861-06. He argues that the decision of the Federal Court “may impact directly” on the appeal. [2] With respect, it is the other way around. What is in issue in appeal A-634-05 is a decision of the Tax Court of Canada dealing with the appellant’s substantive tax liability for his 1998 taxation year and ordering that a reassessment be issued on the basis that the amount of $43, 614 is to be added to the appellant’s income for that year, plus penalties. What is in issue in the proceedings before the Federal Court is the collection of this tax debt. [3] It is therefore important that the appeal not be delayed since the outcome, if favourable to the appellant, stands to resolve both proceedings. [4] The application will be dismissed with costs to the respondent. “Marc Noël” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-634-05 STYLE OF CAUSE: ARTHUR ROMAN ZINS and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN MOTION DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NOËL J.A. DATED: September 15, 2006 WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY: FOR THE APPELLANT / APPLICANT Franco Calabrese John Grant FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: FOR THE APPELLANT / APPLICANT John H. Sims, Q.C. FOR THE RESPONDENT