R. v. Peniston
The touching was trivial, consensual or innocuous and falls within the de minimis non curat lex principle; objectively a reasonable officer placed in the constable's position did not have reasonable and probable grounds to arrest under s.495, therefore the Crown failed to prove assault beyond a reasonable doubt and the accused is acquitted.
- Citation
- 2003 NSPC 2
- Parties
- Accused: John Mark Peniston; Complainant: Nancy Peniston; Prosecutor: Regina (Crown)
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 15 January 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Assault (domestic) / Trial Decision (provincial Court)
- Outcome
- Acquittal (not guilty)
- Legal Topics
- Assault, De Minimis Non Curat Lex, Arrest Without Warrant, Reasonable and Probable Grounds, Public Interest Arrest, Consent, Summary Conviction Procedure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Mark Peniston
Accused
Nancy Peniston
Complainant
Regina (Crown)
Prosecutor
Procedural Posture
Criminal Assault (domestic) / Trial Decision (provincial Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused's touching amounted to criminal assault
- 2 Whether the common law defence de minimis non curat lex applies
- 3 Whether the warrantless arrest was lawful under Criminal Code s.495
Ratio Decidendi
The touching was trivial, consensual or innocuous and falls within the de minimis non curat lex principle; objectively a reasonable officer placed in the constable's position did not have reasonable and probable grounds to arrest under s.495, therefore the Crown failed to prove assault beyond a reasonable doubt and the accused is acquitted.
Court Disposition
Acquittal (not guilty)
Orders
- Accused John Mark Peniston found not guilty and acquitted on the record
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment