R. v. C.D.W.
The accused committed a minor assault proven beyond a reasonable doubt and, balancing societal interests including protection of youth care workers and the YCJA objective to minimize stigmatizing convictions, the court rejects the de minimis defence and convicts on the assault and two recognizance breaches while recognizing YCJA sentencing options permit a lenient, less stigmatizing disposition.
- Citation
- 2016 NSPC 31
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: W.(C.D.)
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Youth Criminal Trial / Trial Decision
- Outcome
- Found guilty of assault (s.266(b)) and two breaches of recognizance (s.145(3) x2)
- Legal Topics
- Assault, De Minimis Defence, Breach of Recognizance, Sentencing, Extrajudicial Measures
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
W.(C.D.)
Accused
Procedural Posture
Youth Criminal Trial / Trial Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the de minimis non curat lex defence applies to a minor assault by a youth in a group home
- 2 Whether the accused committed assault
- 3 Whether the accused breached recognizance conditions
Ratio Decidendi
The accused committed a minor assault proven beyond a reasonable doubt and, balancing societal interests including protection of youth care workers and the YCJA objective to minimize stigmatizing convictions, the court rejects the de minimis defence and convicts on the assault and two recognizance breaches while recognizing YCJA sentencing options permit a lenient, less stigmatizing disposition.
Court Disposition
Found guilty of assault (s.266(b)) and two breaches of recognizance (s.145(3) x2)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment