R. v. Burman

R. v. Burman

The court admitted similar fact evidence as highly probative and corroborated by DNA and matching vehicle description, rejected the accused's alibi and denials as not credible, found beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed assault causing bodily harm in both incidents and robbery in the first incident, and applied Kienapple and evidentiary uncertainty to acquit on the second incident's robbery charge.

Citation
2013 BCSC 2395
Parties
Crown: Regina; Accused: Edward Charles Burman
Court
Supreme Court of British Columbia
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
13 December 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Trial Judgment
Outcome
Convicted on Counts 1, 2 and 3; acquitted on Count 4.
Legal Topics
Assault Causing Bodily Harm, Robbery, Similar Fact Evidence, DNA Evidence, Alibi
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Evidence Assault Causing Bodily Harm Robbery Similar Fact Evidence DNA Evidence Alibi

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Crown

Edward Charles Burman

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Trial Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the accused committed assault causing bodily harm and robbery on the dates alleged
  2. 2 Admissibility and probative value of similar fact evidence to establish actus reus and corroborate complainants
  3. 3 Credibility of the accused versus the complainants and the reliability of DNA evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The court admitted similar fact evidence as highly probative and corroborated by DNA and matching vehicle description, rejected the accused's alibi and denials as not credible, found beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed assault causing bodily harm in both incidents and robbery in the first incident, and applied Kienapple and evidentiary uncertainty to acquit on the second incident's robbery charge.

Court Disposition

Convicted on Counts 1, 2 and 3; acquitted on Count 4.

Orders

  • Count 1: guilty as charged
  • Count 2: guilty as charged