Broughton v. Grey and Elma (Townships)
Section 590 and related provisions apply only to drains properly so called (artificial drains constructed and used as outlets); a natural watercourse that is deepened or enlarged is not a 'drain' for purposes of assessing lands in another municipality, and because the Elma lands derived no benefit from the works in Grey the Grey by-law was ultra vires as to those lands and injunction relief was appropriate.
- Citation
- (1897) 27 SCR 495
- Parties
- Appellant/plaintiff: Albert Broughton; Respondent/defendant: Township of Grey; Respondent/defendant: Township of Elma
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 1 May 1897
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (municipal Law) / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Ontario; Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Assessment, Inter Municipal Obligations, Ultra Vires, By Law Validity, Definition of Outlet
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Albert Broughton
Appellant/plaintiff
Township of Grey
Respondent/defendant
Township of Elma
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (municipal Law) / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Ontario; Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s.590 (and related provisions) authorizes a municipality to assess lands in another municipality for works that merely deepen or enlarge a natural watercourse rather than for an artificially constructed drain
- 2 Whether lands in another municipality can be assessed where they derive no benefit from the proposed works
- 3 Whether a landowner may obtain injunctive relief preventing an adjoining municipality from passing a contributory by-law before that by-law is passed
Ratio Decidendi
Section 590 and related provisions apply only to drains properly so called (artificial drains constructed and used as outlets); a natural watercourse that is deepened or enlarged is not a 'drain' for purposes of assessing lands in another municipality, and because the Elma lands derived no benefit from the works in Grey the Grey by-law was ultra vires as to those lands and injunction relief was appropriate.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed with costs
Orders
- By-law No. 53 of the Township of Grey is void and ultra vires insofar as it affects or purports to affect lands in the Township of Elma
- Decree ordered in the action that the Township of Elma be enjoined from passing proposed by-law No. 321 (provisionally passed) and from taking any steps to give effect in the Township of Elma to the said by-law of the Township of Grey
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment