The City of Ottawa v. The Canadian National Railways
Clause 3 must be read in the context of the municipality's established assessment-roll procedure under s.57; the fixed $500,000 valuation applied to any assessment made during the fifteen specified years, including the assessment roll prepared in 1923 as the basis for taxation in 1924, so the fifteen-year period extended to include 1924.
- Citation
- [1925] SCR 494
- Parties
- Appellant / Plaintiff: City of Ottawa; Respondent / Defendant: Canadian National Railway
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 1925
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (municipal Taxation) / Supreme Court of Canada Decision on Appeal From Appellate Division of Ontario
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; judgment of the Appellate Division affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Assessment Valuation, Fixed Valuation Agreement, Term of Years, Assessment Roll Procedure, Statutory and Contractual Interpretation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
City of Ottawa
Appellant / Plaintiff
Canadian National Railway
Respondent / Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal (municipal Taxation) / Supreme Court of Canada Decision on Appeal From Appellate Division of Ontario
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the fifteen-year fixed assessment period expired in 1923 or extended to include 1924
- 2 Whether a valuation entered in an assessment roll prepared in one year as the basis for taxation of the next year falls within the agreement's fixed assessment period
- 3 How to construe clause 3 of the 1907 agreement in light of municipal assessment procedure under section 57 of the Assessment Act
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 3 must be read in the context of the municipality's established assessment-roll procedure under s.57; the fixed $500,000 valuation applied to any assessment made during the fifteen specified years, including the assessment roll prepared in 1923 as the basis for taxation in 1924, so the fifteen-year period extended to include 1924.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; judgment of the Appellate Division affirmed.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment