Gardner v. Kloepfer

Gardner v. Kloepfer

Where creditors were bound by or had acquiesced in a valid assignment in trust for creditors, an unsuccessful attempt to impeach that assignment does not forfeit their right to participate in its benefits; equity will not impose a forfeiture as punishment, so the appellant’s refusal to pay the dividend was not justified.

Citation
(1888) 15 SCR 390
Parties
Appellant (assignee): James Gardner; Respondent (creditor): Christian Kloepfer; Respondent (creditor): Charles Walker; Assignors (debtors): McKenzie & McKinnon
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
14 June 1888
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) Bankruptcy and Insolvency; Trust Dispute Over Assignment for Creditors / Supreme Court of Canada Judgment on Appeal From Court of Appeal for Ontario
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs; Court of Appeal judgment affirmed
Legal Topics
Assignment for Benefit of Creditors, Creditor Rights, Estoppel, Forfeiture, Interpleader, Dividend Distribution
Source Language
English
Bankruptcy and Insolvency Trusts Equity Civil Procedure Assignment for Benefit of Creditors Creditor Rights Estoppel Forfeiture +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Gardner

Appellant (assignee)

Christian Kloepfer

Respondent (creditor)

Charles Walker

Respondent (creditor)

McKenzie & McKinnon

Assignors (debtors)

Procedural Posture

Appeal (civil) Bankruptcy and Insolvency; Trust Dispute Over Assignment for Creditors / Supreme Court of Canada Judgment on Appeal From Court of Appeal for Ontario

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a creditor who unsuccessfully attacks an assignment in trust is barred from sharing in its benefits
  2. 2 Whether a creditor who has acquiesced in an assignment and later litigated against it is estopped from claiming under it
  3. 3 Whether equity permits forfeiture as a punishment for attempting to impeach an assignment

Ratio Decidendi

Where creditors were bound by or had acquiesced in a valid assignment in trust for creditors, an unsuccessful attempt to impeach that assignment does not forfeit their right to participate in its benefits; equity will not impose a forfeiture as punishment, so the appellant’s refusal to pay the dividend was not justified.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs; Court of Appeal judgment affirmed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs
  • Judgment of Court of Appeal for Ontario affirmed