In the Matter of a Plan of Arrangement of UrtheCast Corp.
The court approved the SAR and Geosys asset sales and ordered the assignment because the Monitor supported the transactions, Antarctica Capital and its Purchasers provided reasonable assurance (not an ironclad guarantee) they could raise necessary capital and had committed funds and due diligence, the assignment was necessary to preserve a critical income stream and enable restructuring, and the benefits of the restructuring outweighed Land O'Lakes' concerns about alleged contractual defaults and competitive issues; accordingly the tests in s.11.3(3)(b) and (c) and factors in s.36(3) were satisfied.
- Citation
- 2021 BCSC 1819
- Parties
- Petitioner: UrtheCast Corp.; Petitioner: UrtheCast International Corp.; Petitioner: UrtheCast USA Inc.; Petitioner: 1185729 BC Ltd.; Monitor: Ernst & Young Inc. (Monitor); Objector: Land O'Lakes, Inc.; Objector: WinField Solutions LLC; Interested Party: 1262743 BC Ltd.; Proposed Purchaser: Antarctica Capital; Proposed Purchaser: UrtheDaily entities (Purchasers)
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 7 January 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act Proceedings / Application for Extension of Stay and Approval of Asset Sales and Assignments
- Outcome
- Application granted in part and approved as set out by the court
- Legal Topics
- Assignment of Contracts, Asset Sale Approval, Stay Extension, Directors and Officers Releases, Set Off and Cure Obligations
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
UrtheCast Corp.
Petitioner
UrtheCast International Corp.
Petitioner
UrtheCast USA Inc.
Petitioner
1185729 BC Ltd.
Petitioner
Ernst & Young Inc. (Monitor)
Monitor
Land O'Lakes, Inc.
Objector
WinField Solutions LLC
Objector
1262743 BC Ltd.
Interested Party
Antarctica Capital
Proposed Purchaser
UrtheDaily entities (Purchasers)
Proposed Purchaser
Procedural Posture
Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act Proceedings / Application for Extension of Stay and Approval of Asset Sales and Assignments
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether assignee can perform contractual obligations under s.11.3(3)(b) of the CCAA
- 2 Whether it is appropriate to order a non-consensual assignment under s.11.3(3)(c) of the CCAA
- 3 Whether the proposed asset sales should be approved under s.36(3) of the CCAA
Ratio Decidendi
The court approved the SAR and Geosys asset sales and ordered the assignment because the Monitor supported the transactions, Antarctica Capital and its Purchasers provided reasonable assurance (not an ironclad guarantee) they could raise necessary capital and had committed funds and due diligence, the assignment was necessary to preserve a critical income stream and enable restructuring, and the benefits of the restructuring outweighed Land O'Lakes' concerns about alleged contractual defaults and competitive issues; accordingly the tests in s.11.3(3)(b) and (c) and factors in s.36(3) were satisfied.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part and approved as set out by the court
Orders
- Extend the stay of proceedings to February 15, 2021
- Approve SAR Asset Purchase Agreement (SAR APA)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment