Atco Ltd. v. Calgary Power Ltd.
Majority: The statutory phrase "owner of a public utility" in s.2(i) includes a person who, though not legal owner of the utility assets, has the power to control the utility (including by acquisition of voting control through share ownership); "unite/union" in s.98 embraces unions effected by acquisition of shares; accordingly Atco was an "owner" under the Act and the Public Utilities Board had jurisdiction to restrain the takeover absent its consent.
- Citation
- [1982] 2 SCR 557
- Parties
- Appellant: Atco Ltd.; Appellant: 99139 Canada Inc.; Appellant: Canadian Utilities Limited; Appellant: Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited; Appellant: Northwestern Utilities Limited; Appellant: Alberta Power Limited; Respondent: Calgary Power Ltd.; Respondent: City of Calgary; Respondent: City of Edmonton; Respondent: Consumers Association of Canada (Alberta); Respondent: City of Medicine Hat; Respondent: Sunlife Assurance Company of Canada; Respondent: Gordon Securities Limited; Respondent: City of Red Deer; Respondent: Town of Fort MacLeod; Respondent: W. Arsene; Respondent: Town of Coalhurst; Respondent: Town of Picture Butte; Respondent: Public Utilities Board of Alberta
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 2 November 1982
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal; Company Law; Regulatory Review / Final Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada; Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Control, Ownership, Takeover Bid, Jurisdiction, Statutory Interpretation, Union/amalgamation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Atco Ltd.
Appellant
99139 Canada Inc.
Appellant
Canadian Utilities Limited
Appellant
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Appellant
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Appellant
Alberta Power Limited
Appellant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Respondent
City of Calgary
Respondent
City of Edmonton
Respondent
Consumers Association of Canada (Alberta)
Respondent
City of Medicine Hat
Respondent
Sunlife Assurance Company of Canada
Respondent
Gordon Securities Limited
Respondent
City of Red Deer
Respondent
Town of Fort MacLeod
Respondent
W. Arsene
Respondent
Town of Coalhurst
Respondent
Town of Picture Butte
Respondent
Public Utilities Board of Alberta
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal; Company Law; Regulatory Review / Final Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada; Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a parent company is an "owner of a public utility" within s.2(i) of The Public Utilities Board Act
- 2 Whether acquisition of voting shares constitutes a "union" under s.98 of the Act
- 3 Whether the Public Utilities Board has jurisdiction to restrain a takeover of a utility by virtue of s.98
Ratio Decidendi
Majority: The statutory phrase "owner of a public utility" in s.2(i) includes a person who, though not legal owner of the utility assets, has the power to control the utility (including by acquisition of voting control through share ownership); "unite/union" in s.98 embraces unions effected by acquisition of shares; accordingly Atco was an "owner" under the Act and the Public Utilities Board had jurisdiction to restrain the takeover absent its consent.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Order of the Alberta Court of Appeal and the interim order of the Public Utilities Board of Alberta affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment