Canada (Attorney General) v. Johnstone

Canada (Attorney General) v. Johnstone Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2008-03-13 Neutral citation 2008 FCA 101 File numbers A-82-07 Decision Content Date: 20080313 Docket: A-82-07 Citation: 2008 FCA 101 CORAM: LÉTOURNEAU J.A. NADON J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Appellant and FIONA JOHNSTONE Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on March 13, 2008. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on March 13, 2008. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: SHARLOW J.A. Date: 20080313 Docket: A-82-07 Citation: 2008 FCA 101 CORAM: LÉTOURNEAU J.A. NADON J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Appellant and FIONA JOHNSTONE Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on March 13, 2008) SHARLOW J.A. [1] This is an appeal from the decision of Justice Barnes allowing an application for judicial review of a decision of the Canadian Human Rights Commission made under paragraph 44(3)(b) of the Canadian Human Rights Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. H-6, screening out Ms. Johnstone’s complaint (2007 FC 36). We are all of the view that this appeal should be dismissed. [2] The reasons given by the Commission for screening out the complaint indicate that the Commission adopted a legal test for prima facie discrimination that is apparently consistent with Health Sciences Association of British Columbia v. Campbell River & North Island Transition Society, 2004 BCCA 260, but inconsistent with the subsequent decision of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal in Hoyt v. C.N.R., [2006] C.H.R.D. No. 33. We express no opinion on what the correct legal test is. We say only that the Commission’s reasons raise a serious question as to what legal test the Commission actually applied in deciding as it did. In our view that is a valid basis for finding the decision of the Commission to be unreasonable, and justifies the order of Justice Barnes referring the matter back to the Commission for reconsideration. [3] The appeal will be dismissed with costs. “K. Sharlow” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-82-07 (AN APPEAL OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BARNES, OF THE FEDERAL COURT, DATED JANUARY 16, 2007, IN FEDERAL COURT FILE NO. T-1523-05) STYLE OF CAUSE: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA v. FIONA JOHNSTONE PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: March 13, 2008 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: (LÉTOURNEAU, NADON & SHARLOW JJ.A.) DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: SHARLOW J.A. APPEARANCES: CHRISTINE MOHR JOSEPH CHENG FOR THE APPELLANT Andrew Raven Andrew Astritis FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE APPELLANT RAVEN, CAMERON, BALLANTYNE & YAZBECK LLP Barristers & Solicitors Ottawa, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENT