Abbott and Haliburton Company v. WBLI Chartered Accountants
- Citation
- 2012 NSSC 210
- Parties
- Plaintiffs: Abbott and Haliburton Company Limited et al.; First Defendant: White Burgess Langille Inman (WBLI Chartered Accountants); Second Defendant: R. Brian Burgess
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 1 June 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Professional Negligence (auditor Negligence / Negligent Misrepresentation) / Motion to Strike Affidavits in Response to Summary Judgment Motion
- Legal Topics
- Auditor Negligence, Expert Evidence Admissibility, Motions to Strike Affidavits, Summary Judgment, Conflict of Interest in Expert Evidence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Party arguments 1
Parties
Abbott and Haliburton Company Limited et al.
Plaintiffs
White Burgess Langille Inman (WBLI Chartered Accountants)
First Defendant
R. Brian Burgess
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Professional Negligence (auditor Negligence / Negligent Misrepresentation) / Motion to Strike Affidavits in Response to Summary Judgment Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether parts or whole of lay witness affidavit (O'Hearn) should be struck as inadmissible hearsay, opinion or irrelevant under Rule 39
- 2 Whether an expert affidavit/report (MacMillan) may be struck pre-trial for lack of independence and bias and whether such a challenge falls under Rule 39 or Rule 55
- 3 Whether the MacMillan affidavit met threshold admissibility requirements for expert evidence given firm ties to prior Grant Thornton work
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment