Gilmour v. Simon

Gilmour v. Simon

The agent did not have clear, express and unequivocal authority to enter into a binding contract of sale on behalf of the principal; accordingly the contract could not be specifically enforced against the principal and the unauthorized mortgage payoff privilege could not be enforced.

Citation
(1906) 37 SCR 422
Parties
Plaintiff/appellant: Jane Gilmour; Defendant/respondent: Celestin Simon
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
14 April 1906
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal From the Court of King's Bench for Manitoba to the Supreme Court of Canada; Judgment on Specific Performance Claim
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment of the Court of King's Bench for Manitoba dismissing the plaintiff's action affirmed.
Legal Topics
Authority of Agent, Exclusive Agency, Specific Performance, Mortgage Payoff Clause, Construction of Agency Authority
Source Language
English
Agency Property Contract Equity Real Estate Authority of Agent Exclusive Agency Specific Performance +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jane Gilmour

Plaintiff/appellant

Celestin Simon

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / On Appeal From the Court of King's Bench for Manitoba to the Supreme Court of Canada; Judgment on Specific Performance Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the agent had clear and express authority to enter into a binding contract of sale on behalf of the principal
  2. 2 Whether the mortgage payoff privilege inserted by the agent could be enforced against the principal

Ratio Decidendi

The agent did not have clear, express and unequivocal authority to enter into a binding contract of sale on behalf of the principal; accordingly the contract could not be specifically enforced against the principal and the unauthorized mortgage payoff privilege could not be enforced.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment of the Court of King's Bench for Manitoba dismissing the plaintiff's action affirmed.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs.
  • Judgment of the Court of King's Bench for Manitoba dismissing the plaintiff's action affirmed.