Admassu v. Ontario (Court of Justice)
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal because it agreed with the reasons and order of Pollak J.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2008 ONCA 732
- Parties
- Appellant: Ayele Admassu; Respondent: Ontario Court of Justice Family Branch; Respondent: Ms. Marie D’Eon; Respondent: Ms. Ishbel Oglivie; Respondent: Mr. Mario Gonzalez
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal, Dismissal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ayele Admassu
Appellant
Ontario Court of Justice Family Branch
Respondent
Ms. Marie D’Eon
Respondent
Ms. Ishbel Oglivie
Respondent
Mr. Mario Gonzalez
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the order of Pollak J. of the Superior Court of Justice should be overturned on appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal because it agreed with the reasons and order of Pollak J.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Admassu v. Ontario (Court of Justice) Collection Decisions of the Court of Appeal Date 2008-10-28 Neutral citation 2008 ONCA 732 Docket numbers C48809 Judges Laskin, John Ivan; Borins, Stephen; Feldman, Kathryn N. Subject Civil Decision Content CITATION: Admassu v. Ontario (Court of Justice), 2008 ONCA 732 DATE: 20081024 DOCKET: C48809 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO Laskin, Borins and Feldman JJ.A. BETWEEN: Ayele Admassu Plaintiff (Appellant) and Ontario Court of Justice Family Branch, Ms. Marie D’Eon, Ms. Ishbel Oglivie and Mr. Mario Gonzalez Defendants (Respondents) Ayele Admassu, acting in person Amy Leamen, for the respondents Heard: October 23, 2008 On appeal from the order of Justice Andra Pollak of the Superior Court of Justice, dated April 30, 2008. APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT [1] We agree with the decision of Pollak J. [2] Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.