B. E. v. Canada Employment Insurance Commission

B. E. v. Canada Employment Insurance Commission

The benefit period could not be extended because the Appellant did not satisfy any of the statutory grounds in s.10(10); payments from a motor vehicle insurer do not constitute "payments under a provincial law" under s.10(10)(d), and once the 52-week benefit period ended no further benefits are payable.

Citation
2018 SST 352
Parties
Appellant: B. E.; Respondent: Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Court
Social Security Tribunal of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
25 April 2018
Procedural Posture
Employment Insurance Appeal / General Division Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Benefit Period Extension, EI Sickness Benefits, Interpretation of S.10 of the Employment Insurance Act
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

B. E.

Appellant

Canada Employment Insurance Commission

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Insurance Appeal / General Division Decision

  1. 1 Whether the Appellant's benefit period can be extended under section 10 of the Employment Insurance Act
  2. 2 Whether payments from a motor vehicle insurer qualify as "payments under a provincial law" under s.10(10)(d)

Ratio Decidendi

The benefit period could not be extended because the Appellant did not satisfy any of the statutory grounds in s.10(10); payments from a motor vehicle insurer do not constitute "payments under a provincial law" under s.10(10)(d), and once the 52-week benefit period ended no further benefits are payable.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • No extension of benefit period granted; no further benefits payable once benefit period ended