BG v Canada Employment Insurance Commission
The CRA ruled the Appellant had zero hours of insurable employment and the Tribunal is bound by that ruling under s.90 of the EI Act; because the Appellant needed 700 insurable hours in the qualifying period and has none, she does not qualify for EI and the appeal is dismissed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2024 SST 1196
- Parties
- Appellant: B. G.; Respondent: Canada Employment Insurance Commission
- Court
- Social Security Tribunal of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 14 August 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Insurance / General Division Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Hours of Insurable Employment, Qualifying Period, Regional Rate of Unemployment, Binding Effect of CRA Ruling
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
B. G.
Appellant
Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Insurance / General Division Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Appellant worked sufficient hours of insurable employment to qualify for EI benefits
- 2 Whether the CRA ruling on insurability and hours is binding on the Tribunal
Ratio Decidendi
The CRA ruled the Appellant had zero hours of insurable employment and the Tribunal is bound by that ruling under s.90 of the EI Act; because the Appellant needed 700 insurable hours in the qualifying period and has none, she does not qualify for EI and the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment