United States of America v. Thind
The Court found no basis to interfere with Justice Thomas's committal for extradition and therefore dismissed the appeal.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- C39262
- Parties
- Respondent: United States of America; Appellant: Baljinderpal Singh Thind
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 13 January 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Extradition Appeal / Appeal From Order of Committal for Extradition (post Committal)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; committal order for extradition upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Committal for Extradition, Standard of Review on Appeal, Dismissal of Appeal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
United States of America
Respondent
Baljinderpal Singh Thind
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Extradition Appeal / Appeal From Order of Committal for Extradition (post Committal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the committal for extradition should be set aside
- 2 Whether the appellate court should interfere with the trial judge's committal order
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found no basis to interfere with Justice Thomas's committal for extradition and therefore dismissed the appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; committal order for extradition upheld.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
United States of America v. Thind Collection Decisions of the Court of Appeal Date 2004-01-13 Docket numbers C39262 Judges McMurtry, Roy; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Blair, Robert Ashley Subject Criminal Decision Content DATE: 20040113 DOCKET: C39262 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO RE: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Respondent) v. BALJINDERPAL SINGH THIND (Appellant) BEFORE: McMURTRY C.J.O., ABELLA AND BLAIR JJ.A. COUNSEL: Michael W. Caroline for the appellant Kevin Wilson and Marco Mendicino for the respondent HEARD & ENDORSED: January 12, 2004 On appeal from the Order of Committal for Extradition before Justice R. Thomas dated December 9, 2002. APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT [1] We see no basis for interfering with the decision of Thomas J. [2] The appeal is therefore dismissed.